Breath Testing & Intox EC/IR II

A portable breath test in NC, which the law calls an “alcohol screening test,” is the handheld device an officer may ask you to blow into at the roadside, before any arrest. Under G.S. 20-16.3 it can help an officer decide whether there is probable cause, but only as a positive or negative result: the actual number on the screen cannot be used to prove your alcohol concentration, and in most cases cannot even be used to justify the arrest.

+ / −only the positive or negative result may be used, not the number (G.S. 20-16.3(d))
11handheld models on DHHS’s approved list (10A NCAC 41B .0503)
5 minwait before a retest when the first reading is 0.08 or higher (41B .0502)
30 daysmaximum interval between calibration checks during use (41B .0503)

What is a portable breath test in NC?

It is a pre-arrest screening tool, not the evidential breath test. The evidential test is the Intox EC/IR II given after arrest, usually at a jail or testing site; the portable device is a handheld unit used at the scene.

Officers, lawyers and judges call it a PBT, an “alco-sensor” (after the Intoximeters Alco-Sensor line), a preliminary breath test or a roadside breathalyzer. North Carolina’s statute uses the term alcohol screening test, and that term matters because the rules for screening tests are completely different from the rules for the chemical analysis that follows an arrest. The statute is G.S. 20-16.3, and the device and procedure rules are in 10A NCAC 41B .0501–.0503.

Military police officer giving a portable breath test to a volunteer at Fort Bragg, North Carolina
A handheld breath screening device in use during an alcohol-awareness class at Fort Bragg, N.C. (2017). Photo: Capt. Stephen Von Jett, U.S. Army, DVIDS, public domain.
Roadside alcohol screening testEvidential breath test (Intox EC/IR II)
WhenBefore arrest, at the sceneAfter arrest and a charge
StatuteG.S. 20-16.3G.S. 20-16.2 and 20-139.1
Rights advisement first?NoYes, orally and in writing
Waiting periodNone, unless you say you drank in the last 15 minutes15-minute observation before each sample
How the result can be usedPositive or negative only, mainly for probable causeThe number can prove alcohol concentration
RefusalMay be considered in deciding probable causeWillful refusal triggers a 12-month revocation
Sources: G.S. 20-16.2, 20-16.3, 20-139.1; 10A NCAC 41B. Current as of November 2026.

When can an officer ask for an alcohol screening test?

An officer may require a roadside screening test in two situations set out in G.S. 20-16.3(a), and asking for one is not, by itself, an arrest.

  1. Alcohol plus a violation or crash. The officer has reasonable grounds to believe you consumed alcohol and you committed a moving traffic violation or were involved in an accident or collision.
  2. Suspicion of an implied-consent offense. The officer has an articulable and reasonable suspicion that you committed an implied-consent offense (such as DWI) and you were lawfully stopped, for example at a license checkpoint, or otherwise lawfully encountered.

The test must be given “within a relevant time after the driving.” In practice the request usually comes after the officer has noticed an odor of alcohol, asked about drinking, and often after standardized field sobriety tests such as the HGN eye test. If the stop itself was unlawful, everything that follows, including the screening result, can be challenged; see State v. Barnard and State v. Johnson on stops.

G.S. 20-16.3(d)Use of screening test results or refusal

An officer, court or administrative agency may consider the fact that a driver had a positive or negative result on an alcohol screening test, but not the actual alcohol concentration, or that the driver refused the test, in deciding whether there are reasonable grounds to believe the driver committed an implied-consent offense. Negative results may be used to help decide whether apparent impairment is caused by something other than alcohol.

Read the statute on ncleg.gov ↗

Approved portable breath test devices in North Carolina

Only devices approved by DHHS count, and a screening test is valid only if an approved device is used according to the DHHS rules (G.S. 20-16.3(b)–(c)). The approved list in 10A NCAC 41B .0503, as amended effective April 1, 2020, includes 11 models from four manufacturers.

ManufacturerApproved alcohol screening test devices
Intoximeters, Inc.Alco-Sensor (two-digit display); Alco-Sensor III (three-digit display); Alco-Sensor III Enhanced (serial numbers above 1,200,000); Alco-Sensor IV; Alco-Sensor FST; Alco-Sensor FST Enhanced (serial numbers 200,000 and higher)
CMI, Inc.S-D2; S-D5; Intoxilyzer 500
Lifeloc Technologies, Inc.Lifeloc FC10
PAS InternationalAlcovisor Mercury
Source: 10A NCAC 41B .0503(a) as amended in 2020 (NC DHHS rulemaking record). Confirm the current list with the official NC Administrative Code before relying on it.

Not on the list is not a technicality. If the officer used a device that is not approved, G.S. 20-16.3(c) says the screening test is not valid under the statute. The device model is usually on the officer’s report or the DWI paperwork; if it is not, ask.

Army military police sergeant blowing into a handheld portable breath test device during field sobriety training
Handheld screening devices are small fuel-cell or sensor units that display a reading within seconds. Schofield Barracks, Hawaii (2024). Photo: Spc. Devin Davis, U.S. Army, DVIDS, public domain.

How the roadside screening test must be given

The roadside procedure is short, and it has no 15-minute observation period like the evidential test. The rule in 10A NCAC 41B .0502 sets out these steps.

  1. Clear the mouth

    The officer must determine that you have removed food, drink, tobacco, chewing gum and other substances or objects from your mouth. Dental devices and oral jewelry may stay in.

  2. Test as soon as feasible

    Unless you volunteer that you had an alcoholic beverage within the previous 15 minutes, the officer gives the test as soon as feasible. The statute tells DHHS to set the shortest waiting period that does not cause an unacceptable number of false positives.

  3. Retest a high first reading

    If the first reading is 0.08 or higher, the officer waits five minutes and tests again. If the second reading is more than 0.02 lower than the first, the first reading is disregarded.

  4. Additional tests allowed

    The officer may request one or more additional screening tests.

  5. Follow the device instructions

    The device must be operated according to the Forensic Tests for Alcohol Branch instructions that appear on the device.

Why the 15-minute question matters: alcohol still in the mouth from a drink a few minutes earlier can push a handheld reading up. The rule puts the burden of raising recent drinking on the driver (“unless the driver volunteers”), so the officer’s notes about what was asked and said at the scene are important. Our field sobriety case study shows how roadside details are reconstructed later.

Calibration: how often a portable breath test device must be checked

Each device’s calibration must be verified at least once during each 30-day period of use, using a breath simulator or an ethanol gas canister, and logged (10A NCAC 41B .0503).

Simulator solution used only for calibration checks must be changed every 30 days or after 25 checks, whichever comes first, and gas canisters may not be used past their expiration date. The logs are on forms designed by the DHHS Forensic Tests for Alcohol Branch and kept by the officer’s agency under its retention policy. By comparison, the Intox EC/IR II requires preventive maintenance at least every four months and simulator solution changes every four months or 125 tests.

Sources: 10A NCAC 41B .0503 (screening devices: 30 days or 25 tests); 10A NCAC 41B .0323 (Intox EC/IR II: four months or 125 tests).

Calibration does not always require paperwork in court. In State v. Ezzell (2021), the Court of Appeals found calibration adequately shown through a trooper’s testimony that he was responsible for calibrating the device, that it was checked twice a month, and that it was a DHHS-approved model.

Why the number on a portable breath test is not evidence

Since a 2006 amendment, North Carolina law lets officers and courts use only whether the screening result was positive or negative, never the actual alcohol concentration, even for probable cause. That change came in S.L. 2006-253.

The practical effect is significant. A positive result only shows that you had consumed some alcohol, and for a driver 21 or older, drinking and then driving is not itself a crime. As the UNC School of Government’s Shea Denning put it in a 2014 analysis titled “The Old Portable Breath Test Ain’t What She Used to Be,” a positive result adds little to proof of impairment. The State cannot get around the rule by having the officer say he saw the number and believed the driver would “blow over.”

Refusing a portable breath test in NC

You can decline the roadside screening test, but the refusal is not free: under G.S. 20-16.3(d) the officer, a court and the DMV may consider it in deciding whether there were reasonable grounds to believe you committed an implied-consent offense.

Declining the screening test is different from refusing the evidential chemical analysis after arrest. The 12-month license revocation in G.S. 20-16.2(d) is tied to a willful refusal of the chemical analysis that follows a charge and a rights advisement, which the roadside test does not involve. Refusing the post-arrest test, including refusing the second breath sample, is covered in our article on what counts as a willful refusal and the refusal and license notices case study.

Whether to take a roadside test is a decision made in seconds, under stress, without a lawyer. There is no universally right answer, and this article cannot give individualized advice. What helps afterward is an accurate account: write down whether you were asked, how the request was phrased, whether you said you had just had a drink, and what the officer said the result was.

“The roadside number is what they will use in court.”
No. Under G.S. 20-16.3(d), only the positive or negative result may be considered, and not to prove a particular alcohol concentration. The evidential number comes from the Intox EC/IR II.
“Refusing the PBT means an automatic 12-month revocation.”
The 12-month revocation in G.S. 20-16.2(d) is for willfully refusing the chemical analysis after arrest. A roadside refusal may be weighed in deciding probable cause.
“A positive PBT is enough for a DWI arrest.”
Not by itself. In State v. Overocker, a positive result plus drinking and a minor collision did not establish probable cause where there were no signs of impairment.
“Any breathalyzer will do.”
Only DHHS-approved devices, used under the DHHS procedure, produce a valid screening test (G.S. 20-16.3(c)).

What North Carolina courts have said about roadside screening tests

The case law confirms that a positive screening result adds little on its own, that the number must stay out, and that the Fourth Amendment still governs breath testing.

State v. Overocker
236 N.C. App. 423 (2014) · N.C. Court of Appeals

A faint odor of alcohol, drinks at a bar, a positive PBT and a parking-lot collision the driver did not cause did not add up to probable cause for DWI. The court called the State’s attempt to rely on the officer’s belief that the driver would “blow over the legal limit” wholly without merit, because G.S. 20-16.3(d) bars use of the actual concentration.

Read the opinion ↗
State v. Townsend
No. COA14-129 (N.C. Ct. App. Aug. 19, 2014) · N.C. Court of Appeals

Alco-sensor results appeared in the officer’s paperwork offered at a pretrial hearing on probable cause. Because they were never shown to or mentioned before the jury, and the blood test was properly admitted, the court found no reversible error. The case shows how carefully screening results are kept away from the jury.

Read the opinion ↗
State v. Ezzell
277 N.C. App. 276 (2021) · N.C. Court of Appeals

Calibration of the screening device was adequately shown without written records where the trooper testified he alone calibrated it, it was checked twice a month, and it was an approved model. The positive result was properly considered.

Read the UNC SOG case summary ↗
Skinner v. Railway Labor Executives’ Ass’n
489 U.S. 602 (1989) · U.S. Supreme Court

A breath test that requires deep-lung breath is a search under the Fourth Amendment. That is why a roadside screening test needs a lawful basis, which G.S. 20-16.3(a) supplies through its reasonable-grounds and reasonable-suspicion requirements.

Read the opinion ↗
Birchfield v. North Dakota
579 U.S. 438 (2016) · U.S. Supreme Court

After a lawful drunk-driving arrest, police may require a breath test without a warrant as a search incident to arrest, but not a blood test. The roadside screening test comes before arrest, so it rests on G.S. 20-16.3’s own requirements rather than on this arrest-based rule.

Read the opinion ↗

Our case page on State v. Overocker walks through that decision in more detail, and State v. Parisi shows the other side of the probable-cause line.

A positive roadside test tells the officer you had something to drink. It does not tell anyone you were impaired.Adkins & Purkey

Checkpoints, Lake Norman and Stanly County

Checkpoints are one of the most common places to be asked for a portable breath test in NC, because G.S. 20-16.3(a)(2) expressly covers drivers who were “lawfully stopped,” such as at a license check, when the officer has reasonable suspicion of an implied-consent offense.

Volunteer blowing into a portable breath test device during a DUI detection course
Instructors teach that the handheld test should follow, not replace, the field sobriety tests. DUI-detection course, Vance Air Force Base, Okla. (2019). Photo: Airman 1st Class Taylor Crul, U.S. Air Force, DVIDS, public domain.

What happens after the portable breath test

If the officer arrests you, the next step is the implied-consent process and the evidential test on the Intox EC/IR II, which has its own rights, waiting periods and rules. If the officer does not arrest you, the screening result alone does not create a charge.

A negative screening result can also matter: the statute allows it to be used in deciding whether apparent impairment comes from something other than alcohol, which often leads to a blood test for drugs. See prescription drug DWI, marijuana DWI and drug and medication DWI. If the evidential test reads 0.08 or more or you refuse it, a 30-day civil revocation starts immediately.

Army military police traffic investigator blowing into a breath alcohol tester during field sobriety training
Roadside screening and the evidential test are separate steps with separate rules. Schofield Barracks, Hawaii (2024). Photo: Spc. Devin Davis, U.S. Army, DVIDS, public domain.

Your portable breath test checklist

These are the facts and records that decide whether a roadside screening test was valid and how much it can matter. Check off what you have.

  • Why you were stopped, and whether it was a checkpoint
  • Whether you had anything in your mouth (gum, tobacco, food) when tested
  • Whether you told the officer you had a drink in the last 15 minutes
  • How many times you blew, and roughly how far apart
  • The device model, if it appears in the paperwork
  • The agency’s 30-day calibration log for that device
  • Whether the officer’s report mentions a number (it should not be used)
  • Whether you declined the screening test, and exactly what was said
  • All of your DWI paperwork, for your consultation

For the bigger picture, see our North Carolina DWI guide, questions about DWI evidence and how other states handle breath testing in breath test instruments by state.

Charged with DWI in North Carolina?A practical guide to the stop, the science, the DMV & the defenseChris Adkins · Chris Purkey

From our book

Charged with DWI in North Carolina?

The book follows a DWI from the first roadside contact, including the screening test, through the evidential breath test, the DMV and court, with the officer’s and the defense lawyer’s view of each step.

Get the ebook at Barnes & Noble ↗

Portable breath test in NC: frequently asked questions

Is a portable breath test result admissible in North Carolina?

Only as a positive or negative result. G.S. 20-16.3(d) bars using the actual alcohol concentration, and the result cannot prove a particular concentration. The number can be used for probable cause only in zero-tolerance cases such as drivers under 21 and commercial drivers.

Can I refuse a roadside breath test in NC?

You can decline it, but the officer, a court and the DMV may consider the refusal in deciding whether there were reasonable grounds for an implied-consent offense. The 12-month revocation applies to willfully refusing the evidential chemical analysis after arrest.

Which portable breath test devices are approved in NC?

The DHHS list in 10A NCAC 41B .0503 includes Alco-Sensor models from Intoximeters, the CMI S-D2, S-D5 and Intoxilyzer 500, the Lifeloc FC10 and the PAS Alcovisor Mercury.

Does the officer have to wait 15 minutes before a portable breath test?

No observation period is required. The officer must make sure your mouth is clear and gives the test as soon as feasible unless you volunteer that you drank alcohol within the previous 15 minutes.

Why did the officer make me blow twice?

Under 10A NCAC 41B .0502, if the first reading is 0.08 or higher the officer waits five minutes and tests again; if the second is more than 0.02 lower, the first is disregarded. The officer may also request additional tests.

Is a positive PBT enough for a DWI arrest?

Not by itself. A positive result shows only that you consumed alcohol. In State v. Overocker the Court of Appeals agreed there was no probable cause despite a positive PBT where the driver showed no signs of impairment.

Adkins & Purkey, PLLC

Talk to a North Carolina DWI lawyer

If a roadside screening test was part of your arrest, we can review the stop, the device, the calibration records and how the result was used. Offices in Huntersville (Lake Norman) and Locust (Stanly County), serving Charlotte, Mecklenburg, Iredell, Cabarrus, Stanly and courts across North Carolina.

CA
Written by Chris Adkins & Chris Purkey, Adkins & Purkey, PLLC

Chris Adkins is a former Charlotte-Mecklenburg police officer who made several hundred DWI arrests before becoming a defense attorney; he and Chris Purkey have defended hundreds of DWI clients across North Carolina and co-wrote Charged with DWI in North Carolina?

Reviewed November 2026 · Huntersville & Locust, NC

General North Carolina legal information as of November 2026, not legal advice for any specific case. Reading this article does not create an attorney-client relationship. Attorney advertising.